Author: email@edwardulrich.com

I’m curious as to why the resolution hasn’t happened yet.  I hope it will happen soon.  The reason why I think it will still happen is because I haven’t been seeing any sorts of organizations doing such a thing without me, although perhaps that actually might be happening and I just don’t know about it.

In any event the resolution needs to happen soon.  If it doesn’t happen, the following things should occur:

1. People in the situation who fit the criteria of who can bring the resolution should circumvent the requests of whoever is running the situation in order to make the resolution happen, assuming the people who are running the situation are asking people not to bring the resolution any time soon.  (Remember the criteria is one person only, a male, someone who I know well, someone who is well-informed about the situation, and someone who I have not met in Florida.)

2. If somehow step #1 is blocked from happening or it just doesn’t happen, then people should just go over my head and start configuring things for themselves with the understanding that I can’t ever be involved with it, due to the blockage for whatever reason being so insurmountable that the resolution will never be allowed to happen in my case.  But it should be understood that I won’t ever be able to endorse those configurations either.  (Note of course that would be a very unfortunate situation.  I do want the resolution to happen and I’m confident that others want it to happen also, but the world is going down the toilet and things need to start happening soon if in fact it is not already too late.)

I think maybe the fact that I criticize Freemasonry might be a reason why the resolution hasn’t happened yet.  I realize that some good people are Freemasons, including people who are in professions that help people such as firemen and police for example, but nonetheless there are a lot of harmful aspects of the organization that most Masons are kept unaware of due to the compartmentalized and secretive nature of it.

I’ve never been a Freemason or a member of any group that is like it, and I’ve never taken any oaths of secrecy as many Masons are required to do.  I don’t think there is necessarily a big risk in criticizing Freemasonry, however I think there could be a risk for people if they have taken an oath not to do so, so I think perhaps that may be what is causing the delay with the resolution happening.

Due to such circumstances it is important that I first simply receive clarity so the proper decisions can be made.  People must each individually want to be involved with me and my organizations, and they must be able to be involved as well, and if for whatever reason they don’t want to be involved I will certainly respect their wishes.  Also of course there is no pressure for people who I have linked to in my sites to be involved if they don’t want to be.

I’ve never said for people not to do things for themselves if they want to, but rather I’ve always specified that people must never “recruit” by claiming that I will somehow be involved with such organizations or endorse them, which would be an impossible situation for me under the circumstances.  And of course I’ve always stressed that nobody should ever claim that they are organizing anything “for me” for obvious reasons.

Remember that the global elite are both Jewish and non-Jewish at the top of the pyramid, since many of the key controlling families who have part ownership in the central banks are not Jewish, as this new article explains.

I value the information that I find on Henry Makow’s website, but I regret the divisive approach that he sometimes takes, for example he recently he has been posting an antisemitic cartoon meme image which I think is very counterproductive.  I will never take that approach with my websites.

I also notice that he has recently been posting images that say “Every single aspect of (this and that) is Jewish,” which I also think is counterproductive.  I don’t think there is anything wrong with identifying disproportionate Jewish involvement in political issues, however I disagree with saying “‘every single’ aspect of ..”

Most organized antisemitic activism is “a conspiracy of the global elite,” where the elite have been doing whatever they can to cause and organzine antisemitism for a variety of reasons, such as to deflect and avoid exposure due to antisemitism being unpalatable to most people.  They also exploit antisemitism for divisive purposes such as to frighten Jewish people into not criticizing Israel.  For example the elite control the often “pro-Hamas” activist groups that are criticizing Israel’s actions in the current Israel-Palestine conflict, as this video explains.

The global elite could have just as easily put any non-Jewish Freemasons into any of the roles that are “disproportionally Jewish,” however they seem to want to create the antisemitism that is caused by creating a perception of “all Jewish involvement,” which I think is certainly being done for the above mentioned reasons.

[But note that is not to say that there are not issues with Judaism and Israel, however.  Almost 70% of U.S. Jews are Democrats and thus they support open borders in the U.S.  The Jewish group the Hebrew Immigration Aid Society (link, and link) has been involved with bringing in many of the migrants, including specifically bringing unvetted Islamists. (link)  Such advocates never support open borders for Israel, however.  (But note that there are also pro-open borders groups that are affiliated with other religions such as Christianity, as this link explains, and support for Israel and open borders in the U.S. is not universal among Jews, as this link explains.)

Many of the high ranking immigration officials in the Biden administration are Jewish such as Alejandro Mayorkas, however I believe that is intentional on the part of the political Establishment in order to distract and create animosity toward Jews among anti-open borders activists.

It should also be noted that most Republican politicians have as extreme of pro-Zionist views as Democrat politicians do if not worse, such as Lindsey Graham who literally espouses genocidal intent toward Palestinians while he also advocates to import hostile Islamists into the United States. (link and link)]

Some people may wonder why I don’t have a similar article that lays out issues with Judaism in the same manner as this article does about Islam, but I don’t see that as being as relevant since the issues with Judaism aren’t nearly as universal to its adherents as Islam’s issues are to its adherents.

For example, it is true that passages exist in Judaism’s Talmudic scripture that are opposed to non-Jews, however only a small amount of Jews actually take that seriously, whereas conformity to the harmful aspects of Islam are essentially required of all of its adherents and it is often even reinforced with intimidation and violence.

I suppose it could be argued that some of the Jewish leadership takes the extreme aspects of their scripture seriously, but not all of the global elite are Jewish.  I do think it is reasonable to say that almost all of the most high ranking members of the global elite engage in the same practices that are mostly based on a subset of occultic Jewish beliefs, but it is both Jewish and non-Jewish people who are involved in that.  The Stanley Kubrick movie “Eyes Wide Shut” is a good example of that.  Most Jewish people do not practice the extreme occultic beliefs that the global elite do, however.

So I think it is very counterproductive to blame “the Jews” or “Judaism” for problems when most accurately it should be said that it is the “occultic global elite” who are both Jewish and non-Jewish.  For example most of supposedly “Christian” or “Muslim” members of the global elite have the same occultic practices that the rest of the elite does, as this article explains.

Jewish people are fed up with the global elite just like everyone else is, but when activists over-generalize and blame “the Jews” for what is happening it shuts down criticism of what is happening, which is often strategically done by the elite through their infiltration of activist groups.

I’m going to be focusing more on technical issues over the next week or two.

I think the article with the “Overview of America” video is an important one.  As I mentioned in the article, it would not be possible or even preferable to revert the U.S. back to how it was originally specified in the Constitution since the country has changed too much since then, but nonetheless it is important to understand the forces that are at work in order to stop the U.S. from sliding more to the left and into Communism.

I hope the resolution can happen soon.  I’m glad that I’ve always specified how that should happen in order to head off any potential problems.  Remember that I won’t be able to have voting in my organizations due to the circumstances of the situation, but I will always be interested in what people think.

I wonder if some people attempt to draw a parallel between the “Overview of America” video and how I want to configure my organizations, where some might be claiming that I must be some sort of a hypocrite because I’m saying that a “democratically elected constitutional republic” is the most ideal for the U.S. while at the same time I’m saying that I can’t have voting in my organizations.  However that would not be a legitimate comparison because a government of a county has unique requirements that other organizations do not have, specifically because it is only possible for one and only one government to exist that must accommodate everyone in the country.

An organization could exist which is a “democratically elected constitutional republic,” but that would still have all of the drawbacks of any sort of an organization where voting would happen.  Of course people will be able to “vote” with their decision to be involved or not with my organizations, however.

I moved the recent FreedomToons video from NOITV to OMR, along with adding a new video there as well.  I will continue to update OMR for the time being and have it be more “opinionated / satire” oriented, while having NOITV continue to be more neutral in approach, at least for the time being.  I will continue to be moving key OMR articles over to NOITV as well.

Of course it is fine and important to criticize Israel, but it is only beneficial to do so in a way that is as accurate and palatable as possible.   Most Jewish people who are paying attention are also fed up with everything that is happening, however when blame is aimed at “the Jews” (implying “all” of them and “only” them) rather than the global elite it shuts down the criticism of what is happening, which has been one of the most significant reasons why the problems have become as bad as they have.

The global elite actually depend on anti-Semitism in order to avoid exposure, so they intentionally foment and organize it.   (For example, in my opinion that is why the intentionally “odious” Biden administration has put Jews in most key positions, when in fact it could have just as easily placed any non-Jewish Freemasons in those positions instead.)

It is true that many of the global elite are Jewish, but not all of them are and many live in Europe, the United States, and elsewhere.   Therefore the U.S. and EU could supposedly be considered to be as culpable as Israel is with the problems, but Israel is the country that is designated to take the blame.   (And actually no “country” is culpable, the same global elite control essentially all countries.)   See this article that I think explains the situation as accurately and fairly as possible.

[Note: I’ve seen news stories about this alligator in the past years (link and link, for example), it’s a shame that this happened to him and his owner.   A GoFundMe page exists to help support efforts to find him.]

A tame celebrity “emotional support alligator” named Wally was stolen from an enclosed pen while his owner was visiting a friend in Georgia, leading to the alligator being captured by authorities who released him into a swamp not realizing who he was.   The alligator was famous for loving to be around people, and he had never bitten anybody.

Some people stole Wally from his fenced outdoor enclosure in Brunswick, Georgia where he was sleeping between 4:30 am and 7:00 am, and they deposited him outside of someone’s home as some sort of a stupid prank, where the people in the house then called the authorities which led to the alligator being trapped and released in the wild.   Presumably the perpetrators knew who the alligator was when they took him.

The trapper said that he released the alligator into a very large swamp with 20 other alligators, and it would very difficult if not impossible to find him.   What is worse is that Wally would likely not be able to survive on his own due to being accustomed to being fed by people.

Wally’s owner Joie Henney made a TikTok video with a plea to help find him.

Wally’s Facebook page has been updating fans of the situation of Wally’s disappearance.   [Note however that I’m not able to read it because I don’t have a Facebook account, it is a shame that they don’t have a social media account with another service that lets non-members read it.]

I’m having some technical issues with the WordPress installation for this site, so I will be re-installing it soon.

In the meantime I have posted here this simple HTML approximation of the posts of the first page of this site, and I may add some additional posts here before the real site is running again.

[Update: April 12, 2024— Actually perhaps my attitude in this post is too lenient for an optimally sustainable society.  There are all sorts of different types of mentalities in the world and all can have positive aspects even though some can be argued to also potentially have negative aspects.  For example if too many people adopt what could be called “overly individualistic” or even “selfish” mentalities (which perhaps I could be accused of), it would ultimately be bad for society.

It would not be good if everyone in society was any “single way,” but it would certainly be bad if “everyone” was in a particularly selfish mode.

Society does benefit from supposed “free thinkers,” but if that encroaches too much into adulterating proven effective conservative mentalities it will be very harmful, especially because that is being engineered to happen with malicious intent.

So actually the lenient attitude that I espoused in this post must be completely frustrating to many people.

It is frustrating to me that since the resolution hasn’t happened I don’t have real input of the perspective of other people, which is essential.  For example perhaps the concept that I’m explaining in this update has already become widespread among many people in the situation in general.  I certainly value what people think even though there won’t be “voting” in my organizations, so that is why it is essential that the resolution happens first.]

 

I see that recreational marijuana may be legalized in Florida if it is voted for in November (link).  I know that is a divisive topic and many people are opposed to that, and I assume that a lot of people who agree with the information on my websites are opposed to the use of that.

I’ve smoked marijuana in the past, and I’ve never had any types of substance abuse problems.  I smoked it relatively recently also as people might even know.  Prior to recently it had been a long time since I’ve done that, but I never actually decided to stop doing it.

Recently in the past months I was trying to decide if I should smoke it or not within the situation.  I think I may have been somehow “expected” by some people out there to not do it, but I know that I will do it again in the future so I figured that I shouldn’t be a hypocrite and go ahead and do it.

I realize that many people have substance abuse problems and a lot of people know people who have substance abuse problems so they are very put off by the concept of using marijuana and often also alcohol, so I don’t really “advocate” for its recreational use even though I still do it sometimes.

Perhaps I should have just refused to do it and created an unspoken impression that I don’t smoke anymore while continuing to potentially do it in private now and then, but then there would be accusations of hypocrisy, etc..  And what then would the limits be to my acting like that?  Would I also have to act as if I’m opposed to drinking beer for example?

In any event I don’t like the thought that my sometimes using it could put off a lot of people who would like to be involved with my organizations.  I would definitely prefer to be discreet about it, but I don’t know the parameters of my situation in order to know where discretion can actually exist within it.  I rarely do it in any event.

As far as legally, I think it is a bad idea to legalize the recreational use of it, but rather there should be limits in place such as people needing a prescription to get it as apparently is the case now in Florida.  There should also be ordinances in place to ensure that it is as discreet as possible, for example I think towns should outlaw references to it on storefronts even if they are legally selling it to people with prescriptions.

I also think businesses and some professions should be allowed to discriminate based on drug use even if the employees have a prescription to use it (so perhaps instead of a “prescription” it could be a “permit”), and the penalties for driving when under the influence of drugs and alcohol should be severe.

I eventually would like to make an article that lists issues with the legality of it which fairly gives the arguments for the various viewpoints, and the article could also give a platform to the concept of the benefits of choosing not to use marijuana or any drugs and alcohol in any event.

___

Fasting works so well, I can’t recommend doing that enough.  When the week is finished I’m always ready to get going again with a more planned and healthy eating schedule.  This time I’m going to switch to a mostly raw food diet and likely stick with that for a while rather than fasting again in the following week as I was previously thinking about doing.

I suppose I shouldn’t really call what I’m doing “fasting” though because I’m not doing it properly enough due to my drinking coffee.  So instead perhaps I should just call it “not eating”..  I’m still losing about the same weight though, so I see value in what I’m doing anyway.  I wouldn’t recommend doing anything like that for longer than a week in any event.

I’ve recently figured out an excellent additional aspect to that which eases doing it quite a bit, where I make a “broth” in the microwave using water, balsamic vinegar, hot sauce, chili-lime seasoning, some salt, and even a bit of vegetable oil, which tastes exactly like a great vegetable soup.

___

It is very strange that the articles on the second page of this website have not been showing even though the articles still exist!  I’ve been too busy with other technical tasks to find why that is.

___

When I speak with people and they ask me what I do for a living, I simply say that I’m a “graphic designer” and I “work with computers,” which is not untrue.  I also say that I “work with clients” which is technically true.

I think in many cases people might be expecting me to mention my websites, but I don’t want to mention that because the resolution hasn’t happened yet, and I don’t want to have political discussions with people in the situation before that happens.  I’m sure that people understand but I do feel a bit deceitful by not mentioning the websites anyway.

The new helmet that I bought is working out well, it is actually quieter than I initially gave it credit for.  And when it is combined with the device that I mentioned in a previous post it is extremely quiet from wind noise.

Wind noise with my previous helmet was a problem, but the addition of the device that I mentioned pretty much fixed that.  However it is not always really convenient to wear that device on sort trips.

It is also possible to add this “Wind Jammer” device underneath such helmets, so I ordered one of those and I will report the results.

Other than the wind issue, I like the design of the previous helmet though.  It has a field of view that is so large that you don’t see any part of the helmet when you are looking out from it, and you can wear any glasses with it.  I think I made a mistake with my choice of its color though, which was a part of my decision to replace it rather than to keep working on fixing the wind issue.  I would buy a darker color if I were to buy one again.