I’ve been busy with things, it is coming along well.
I think it will be great when the resolution finally happens. I’m surprised that I haven’t really seen people moving ahead with their own plans for political activism in the meantime. So that makes me think that there must be a lot of people out there who are pulling for me, and it also makes it seem as if a lot of positivity is happening due to people at least seeing the important information that I’m communicating about, even though the benefit of the resolution hasn’t happened yet.
As I’ve always said, there could be two main potential “sins” of people who are attempting to be involved that would have bad consequences for the situation. The first would be people attempting to claim that they are “organizing things ‘for’ me,” where I think only opportunists who actually have malicious intent would attempt to do such a thing, especially because I have said not to do that. Only I will be able to make the decisions about how my organizations are configured, and only after the resolution happens. (But that is not to say that there aren’t things that people could do to help in the meantime, however.) The second sin would be for a pre-existing organization to try to “take a vote” about if it would be involved with my organizations, rather than everyone making that decision only for themselves. If “groups” of people would vote to be involved, then it would mean that many people would end up being involved who don’t actually want to be, and in fact some could even be “adversaries” of my organizations.
I think there might be people out there who are attempting to claim that a “universal” resolution can happen with me where “everyone can be happy” with the result, however I don’t think that can really be the case. I’m very critical of problems associated with Islam, illegal immigration, transgenderism being forced onto everybody, and aspects of Zionism for example, so in many cases people who support the issues that I criticize won’t want to be involved with my organizations, which is their prerogative. However I’m worried that there are people out there who are trying to rope such people into being involved anyway, which certainly would not work out well. (For example, perhaps many Muslims secretly appreciate my criticism of Islam, but many of them would not be willing to openly support such criticism due to their cultural norms such as the death penalty for apostasy.)
What matter most is that I will receive clarity when the time comes, after which I will be able to make the best decisions for my organizations, most importantly starting with deciding how they will be configured. After that, people who would like to be involved will be able to have an opportunity to do so. (And as I’ve always said I can’t endorse the organizations of people who I’ve known in the past such as during the situation, because it would cause problems where all sorts of people would then automatically expect my endorsement, including in cases where I disagree with what they are saying and doing.)
And as I always say I will not be able to allow “voting” in my organizations. People should instinctively know if they want to be involved or not, where my organizations will be ideal for people who strongly agree with what I’m communicating and appreciate the fact that voting won’t be allowed for all of the important reasons that I’ve identified in the past. I will always certainly be interested in what people think, however. “Vote” with your decision to be involved when the time comes.
With all that being said, obviously it is the prerogative of the organizations that I have been linking to with my websites to do whatever they want to do. With many of them I agree with the specific information that I link to (or most of it) while at the same time I don’t necessarily agree with other things that they say elsewhere. As an example, perhaps an organization happens to advocate for “global warming alarmism” in other articles on their website, which I don’t agree with. Just keep in mind that just because I’ve linked to certain pieces of information from an organization, it does not mean that I necessarily endorse the rest of its information. (But this does not mean that I will link to information from organizations of people who I have known from the situation, where I will likely not want to do that even if I happen to agree with what they are saying.)
The political problems that I communicate about are so horrifying that I think many people in “PC corporate work culture” will not want to acknowledge such truths or be activists about it despite how accurate and relevant the information is. Yet as far as I can tell it seems as if people are attempting to rope such people into becoming involved anyway, which I think could be a source of problems. It is great if people are spreading awareness of the issues that I’m communicating about, but ultimately people need to make their own individual decision to be involved with my organizations— instead of being “dragged into it” just because they happen to be a part of a group, such as because they only happen to be working somewhere.
I believe that the chances are high that the situation might ultimately result in large opposing “camps” of people— where some camps in particular may likely be backed by the political Establishment and try to portray themselves as being “an alternative that is fair to everyone”— where their focus would be attempting to conceal, distract from, and otherwise deceitfully downplay many of the significant political problems that I communicate about. For example one might claim to exist in order to supposedly “counter ‘Islamophobia’, ‘homophobia’, ‘anti-Semitism’, and ‘misinformation’ about the danger of Covid vaccines,” where the people running it would be knowingly dishonest about what they are communicating and have intentionally harmful intent, and many of the other people who are involved would be the same while others would attempt to convince themselves that they are “being dishonest for the greater good.”
In any event, once the resolution happens I will know what my resources are and be able to make the appropriate decisions for moving forward properly.
I hope all is well.