I’ve re-posted the Anastasio Somoza article with more images from the book, and I’ve cleaned up the text of it a bit as well. That is such a fascinating story, I think it is really important that people read the actual chapter summary pages for it rather than just the descriptive paragraph for each.
I noticed that on the last page of that article I mentioned the “Protocols of the Elders” document and I linked to the article on NOITV that explains that it is actually associated with Freemasonry rather than Judaism; however that document is perhaps the ultimate controversial topic that someone can mention, and doing so can really put people off. I think mentioning it definitely didn’t fit well at the end of the article like that, so I took it off of the page. I think it can be ok to mention it in a different context as long as the circumstances of it are explained well enough, but nonetheless it can often ultimately be counter-productive to mention it at all. At the time I felt that it was important to mention it because it was a lot of “circumstantial supporting evidence”, however there is so much other more palatable and verifiable evidence out there that doing so is not necessary.
Also I’ve been finding myself doing the timing of things again, and it is being problematic like it always had been. I like giving “ups” to the seven, but doing so poisons the other numbers and times! It’s a bad idea to do it, there is no benefit, so I’m going to stop doing that again (including with the lights!) So I hope people are not insulted by it or whatever, that is really a miserable type of situation to be stuck in, and it’s really liberating to not be worried about that.
I hope all is well!